I believe there’s nonetheless Kaldheim spoilers happening outdoors, however on this snug bubble, we’re on the penultimate article of this sequence the place we rank each planeswalker primarily based on their variety of decks on EDHREC. These articles are all the time enjoyable to put in writing as a result of now we’re onto playing cards that everyone is aware of and that everyone has an opinion on. Step away from the new hotness and stroll with me as we take a look at a few of the strongest ‘walkers from throughout Magic‘s historical past.
Ooh, beginning off with a very good one!
20:: 8,226 Decks
In some sense, 20th place feels far too low for favorite Elk machine, however Jace might be #2 by a large margin. Jace was launched properly earlier than I began taking part in Magic, however even I can regale you with the story of the Standard menace, Cawblade. A finely tuned loss of life machine of , , and that killed quick but in addition bought to run Jace, who took over any sport he survived in. Jace was the first planeswalker that was so highly effective that he had to be banned, and this was in 2012 when banning issues in Standard solely happened every eight or nine years. Jace nonetheless sees play in formats as far back as Vintage. Of course, persons are going to need to play a card that holds such a resume in Commander. He’s the authentic busted planeswalker that you just heard whispers of in the cafeteria, and, in contrast to Oko, lots of people have fond reminiscences taking part in him.. He is, and possibly endlessly will likely be, the most iconic planeswalker of all time. He’s most likely not the strongest anymore; I believe we kinda have to present that to everybody’s
However, in one other sense, 20th place additionally feels method increased thandeserves. In Commander, Jace is nearer to than he’s to : he doesn’t scale to multiplayer properly. When your opponent performs a Jace in 1v1, they will make him tough to kill. They can get him out of vary with the +2, they will bounce no matter dork would possibly kill him with the -1, and in the event that they suppose Jace is secure, then they will simply all day lengthy and overwhelm you with worth. With a number of opponents, 5 loyalty isn’t going to maintain him alive as lengthy, and bouncing one creature doesn’t stifle two of your three opponents. None of Jace’s talents are terrible in Commander, however Jace actually solely works when he sticks round consuming opponents’ sources. He’s not gonna do this a lot in Commander. You’ll most likely solely a pair occasions earlier than Jace kicks the bucket. He’s kinda wanting similar to , and that’s a sentence that I believed I’d by no means say.
So can I actually say the mystique of Jace is value the lackluster gameplay? I imply, Jace has numerous different houses. Jace continues to be a Modern card, a Legacy card, a Vintage card, a dice card, and extra. He actually doesn’t want Commander. Can I actually say that the ethos of Jace is value it when the card would possibly by no means truly dwell as much as that ethos?
Do you even know who’s penning this?
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: Come on! If I ever opened a Jace, how may I not windmill slam him in any blue deck I had?! Commander is the format the place there’s extra to deckbuilding than how the card mechanically works.
19:: 8,297 Decks
I believe that is the most performed‘walker in Commander, and as a vanilla ‘walker for black decks that features some worth earlier than dying, is okay. Draws playing cards, kills creatures, has numerous loyalty, and was just lately reprinted in a precon, (Side notice, Wizards please hold doing that.) He undoubtedly prospers in slower, lower-power metas, however he does good work in these metas.
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: The final solely messing up one opponent is fairly bizarre. You may simply have him say “Whenever a player draw a card, each opponent loses 2 life,” however no matter.
18:: 8,349 Decks
Picture this. You play an Izzet spellslinger deck. You’ve been contemplating planeswalkers like, however they simply don’t do it for you. Suddenly, Wizards provides you ! He’s principally every thing that your spellslinger deck may need from a ‘walker. His -2 is a free strategy to fork no matter spell you would like, his static is principally that additionally works with spell copies, and he goes infinite with playing cards like ! He’s principally an ideal spellslinger ‘walker!
Small drawback: your deck continues to be an Izzet deck, and whereas Ral can do numerous what your deck desires on paper, in follow, he’s going to die earlier than he truly does a lot of something. He simply does nothing to guard himself, and also you’ll need to save your safety spells for playing cards like. You take a look at playing cards that deal harm on spells like , you take a look at copying spells like , and also you take a look at infinite combos you’ve gotten with . Sure, you realize that Ral is all of these issues, however you realize that every thing he does is replaceable. Ral is so shut, however he’s nonetheless not fairly ok to beat his draw back. You sigh, and put Ral down, shedding a single tear for what might need been.
Over, Under, or Just Right? Overplayed: The ethical of the story? Don’t have introspective soliloquies about Magic playing cards; they don’t have emotions.
17:: 8,416 Decks
(983 Decks as a Commander, 7,433 Decks as a Card)
And we attain the final of the planeswalker commanders, though artifact decks are overloaded with planeswalkers to play, however Daretti is mono-red, so he can go in additional artifact decks usually.is principally this excessive off of play in the 99 of random artifact decks. I used to be by no means an enormous fan of as a card. It’s positive, nevertheless it’s extra work for my recursion than I would love. However, you tack on some rummaging if you don’t have any creatures in play, and an final that will get downright nutty with stuff like or , and it seems quite a bit higher. I do fear a bit as a result of
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: Although I’ll take this chance to remind you of. It’s ludicrous that that Daretti is so low.
16:: 8,837 Decks
before the data got updated, and when it fell out, I used to be kinda unhappy. OG Lilly was one in every of the few pre-War of the Spark ‘walkers that folks fairly unanimously determined was ok for EDH. Most of the time, Liliana is principally simply double at 5 mana. Sure, that’s actually sluggish, nevertheless it’s additionally splendidly derpy in a method that EDH loves. The indisputable fact that such a meticulous, over-the-top impact as tutoring twice over two turns just isn’t solely playable, however fairly dang good in grindy video games is, like, half the motive I really like EDH as a format.was in the high ten planeswalkers
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: I don’t suppose I can say extra decks ought to be taking part in Lilly, however I’m a bit unhappy about it.
15:: 8,847 Decks
is a difficult one to judge. On the one hand, I like each capacity Chandra has. She’s bought the as the +1. She’s bought mana ramp as her different +1. She can take away respectable threats if vital, and her final passes the take a look at of profitable most video games you resolve it. She’s each versatile and highly effective.
On the different hand, I’d kinda like her to stay a while, and I’m unsure how properly crimson can assist her do this. Her minus is the solely method she will be able to shield herself, and that solely snipes a single risk. Plus, if you play Chandra, the solely factor you possibly can actually do along with her is dome the desk for 2. It’s unlikely you’ll have sufficient mana to forged an impactful card off both of her +1s till the late sport.
I can’t fairly resolve if Chandra is superb or mediocre. I believe in the end, I’ll give her the thumbs up as a result of her suite of talents is admittedly good, however I could retract that after the eighth time that she dies with out doing something for me.
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: Next time somebody asks on your favourite, say . That’ll get them!
14:: 9,046 Decks
What’s that? There’s different textual content on this Garruk? That could also be, however the final time I’ve seen the +1 activated on this Garruk was when it bought reprinted in the precon occasion in 2020, and so they solely did it as a result of they’d no creatures to snap his neck for. Yourand are all the time at the very least or , and infrequently a lot, far more than that.
And that’s an excellent capacity, however have you ever ever truly learn the remainder of this card? Because the different talents are additionally fairly dang good. His +1 makes a 3/3! Those will likely be fairly respectable blockers towards all however the greatest board states, after which in case you resolve to turbo to his final, he’ll create a deadly board principally each time.
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: I can see why most of the time folks select to snap his neck, however don’t overlook there’s extra textual content on this man.
13:: 9,919 Decks
I’d argue few people have happy memories of playing Teferi, so I don’t suppose he deserves to be this excessive. Yeah, certain, the static is backbreaking towards sure decks. I received’t deny that the majority of my blue decks dwell in worry of playing cards like , however most of my inexperienced decks snicker at the considered taking part in issues at instantaneous pace. Heck, generally, Teferi is a boon to me. “You wanna shut down counterspells and removing? Okay, I forged .” More gamers means extra solutions, and locking these out could be very dangerous. Unless you’re a hardline management deck that may actually benefit from locking opponents out, Teferi might be going to do little or no at finest, and be dangerous at worst.is principally seeing play due to his fame of being damaged in 1v1 Magic, however in contrast to Jace,
Even when he does do issues, he’s very simple to disrupt. When Teferi is nice, he’s public enemy primary, and his -Three isn’t going to assist him a lot with a number of opponents. All this collectively makes Teferi a card I might solely run solely in the most stax-y of stax decks. If you don’t need opponents to work together along with your stuff, it’s most likely higher to run playing cards that make your stuff uncounterable, like, or give it hexproof, like , that aren’t as fragile as Teferi.
Over, Under, or Just Right? Overplayed: Let the scars from different codecs fade, and I believe folks will see what this card actually does right here, which isn’t fairly as a lot as you’d count on.
12:: 10,480 Decks
When I consider Suspend 1. Heck, she’s eclipsed at this level and is approaching . Guess nobody truly cares about Nissa’s emotions. They simply wanna get the emblem and throw her in the rubbish., I consider her -ing issues, or making lands into big dorks, however I fully overlook she’s additionally with
Over, Under, or Just Right? Just Right: Sorry, Nissa. Hard to fault them, although.
11:: 10,712 Decks
I’ll be sincere, in case you have been to ask me what ought to be #1 on this checklist, I’d say Venn diagram of each single Izzet archetype, at the middle of that diagram could be this one card. Spellslinger loves this card as one other copy of . Artifacts decks clearly love Saheeli making synergistic dorks each flip. Control decks wanna have methods to clog up the board. Even Izzet superfriends will play her to make a ton of blockers for his or her ‘walkers. The cherry on top: it’s 25 cents! I believe in case you have been attempting to make an Izzet auto-staple, it’d be harder to do higher than Saheeli.. Sure, being two colours does restrict it, however I believe in case you made a
Over, Under, or Just Right? Underplayed: I’m guessing this will likely be one in every of the highest-ranked card I ever give an underplayed to.
And quickly it ends! I’ll be taking subsequent week off for EDHREC set opinions, however after we come again in two weeks, we’ll undergo the high ten ‘walkers! What do you think of these ‘walkers that don’t fairly attain the heights of the single digits? Do you’ve gotten a very good deck for? Is there a ‘walker you’re stunned didn’t make the high ten? Let me know in the feedback! Until subsequent time!